Continued Embarrassment .
@Whitehawk I believe we asked for some further information from you to help us resolve the issues you have with Runbox 7?
I don’t see the benefit of continuing to post comments like the one above unless you are also willing to contribute to helping us make things better? For that we need more information from you as @Geir politely requested 
Not only the comments but the tone of @Whitehawk indicates that, whatever Runbox accomplish, he will not be satisfied with.
I suggest, if not satisfied with Runbox, he seeks an alternative provider, I’m sure they would welcome his custom.
Perhaps. I understand the frustration and we’ve discussed the progress with Runbox 7 elsewhere on the forum. A variety of views have been expressed in these other topics and there is value in those discussions.
However, I see no value in this particular topic staying open so I am going to close it now. Anyone who wants to discuss Runbox 7 progress will find plenty of topics at https://community.runbox.com/c/runbox-7/23 and contributing to specific ones when you experience a particular issue or bug is really useful.
We’re also open to suggestions for features and enhancements too
Anyone with a GitHub account can also contribute at https://github.com/runbox/runbox7
1 Like